Why are horror movies so obsessed with castration?

Castration is a big theme in basically every movie we watched over this term. I Spit on Your Grave is particularly fond of this trope as w...

Sunday, April 19, 2020

Nosferatu and the Decay of Fear



    This is an image that many people who watched the popular Nickolodeon tv show "Spongebob Squarepants" will recognize, those most are missing the key context. The episode this shot is shown in is meant to be one showcasing the character's fears and how ridiculous they become as time passes. By the end of the episode, a non-sequitur is thrown in. Nosferatu, a horror villain, is used in what is arguably the funniest gag in the show's history. This was a film made before there were large scale regulations on filmmaking, the only constraints were the abilities of the crew, no one telling them they were going too far. But when I was watching the movie I noted that this shot, and the one preceding it make up the scariest part of the movie. I wasn't scared but I found it eerie.
This seems odd, one of the most popular horror films of all time and the scariest part has become a joke. Don't get me wrong this movie is amazing, lovely set pieces and camera work come together to make a good film. But it's not scary. At least not to me, or most modern audiences.
This brings up another point, in the last film I posted about Texas Chainsaw Massacre audiences were so horrified by what they saw that the movie was often condemned or outright banned from being shown. But many people in the class found themselves laughing.
    Fear has decayed in our society. Or the tolerance for fear has become much higher than before.
    If I showed an audience from 1922 (the year Nosferatu was released) the most garbage B rated horror movie from the last decade, say The Bye Bye Man, I feel like most of us would agree at least half of them would pass out from either shock or fear (or perhaps the fact that this is a film with sound, color, and technology beyond their understanding but that's beside the point). But again this is what we today consider a terrible movie with no scare value.
    I think there are three reasons for this shift in what we as a culture find scary. The first being that as people get used to Body Genre films filmmakers are forced to "up the ante" in order to get similar reactions from their audiences. We see this all the time from porn actors (mostly women) who complain that their directors are forcing them to perform more brutal and hardcore situations in order to keep getting views and payments from their films. From internet "celebrities" who perform wilder stunts so as to get more attention. In horror where slasher films get more blood and gore, psychological films begin to incorporate technology that has yet to be invented, and monsters who kill people in more creative and brutal ways.
    The second has to do with the world as a whole. As the World Wide Web became more popular and social media applications more mainstream people saw real-world horror. I remember coming home one day crying because a friend of mine had told me she found a video of a man skinning puppies online. I hadn't even seen the video but it was enough for me at the time. But I have seen movies that involve people being skinned alive and I barely flinch. Our capacity for empathy, especially towards fictional people, has been changed. Videos of unarmed men being shot by police in the streets, tales of people who were captured and tortured by different governments, people's experiences with real trauma have changed how we are able to connect to characters experiencing fake fear. When we are exposed to more and more of the real world it becomes harder to take these films seriously.
    The final one is a little obvious but changes in technology and the ways horror films are made have also affected what we find scary. More realistic props and color help make the world these characters inhabit seem real, sure. But I also found the sound design to be a bigger point. While watching Nosferatu I kept thinking about how the sound design in the film could have been more in tune with what I saw on screen. The music seemed almost disconnected and I'm not sure if it was the version I was watching or if it had to do with how grating I found the score. But little noises in modern films help to build to the world and the anticipation of what is to come. Take the sound of each character's footsteps in A Quiet Place, the squeaks of Danny's trike as he rides through the halls of the Overlook Hotel in The Shining,  or even the orchestral stings from the opening shots of Texas Chainsaw Massacre. The ways these films are made are so different when compared to the silent era. Synchronized sound being the biggest reason for these changes.
     Nosferatu is a prime example of a well-made horror movie that has decayed with time. As technology and cultural focus changes, I am left to wonder what horror films of the future will hold. Perhaps Virtual Reality will take the place of traditional filmmaking? After all, what's more, terrifying than being in the very same place as the characters?

7 comments:

  1. Hi Hannah, I totally loved your blog and agree with a'lot of the points being made. I especially love your discussion on this film with modern audiences and how we are desensitized to it now more then ever.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I was thinking the same thing about the score! It was so over the top, classic vampire organ music that it made the scenes impossible to actually see as creepy. It also reminded me of this time on the internet (lol I could start so many lines with that) I ended up in a rabbit hole of scary clips set to very disturbing songs and sounds. This is relevant here, because I remember several scenes of Nosferatu were in them, and at the time I remember being quite frightened from it. Flashback to now, there is no way I could see this as scary, I even think watching the film with no sound would have more effect because we would just have to sit with the silence and our own thoughts lol.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I like your take on how what is "frightening" in the world of art and entertainment changes with time. Indeed, one would be hard pressed to find an adult who would be genuinely scared by the "Dracula" portrayed on screen in Nosferatu. Eerie, yes. Terrifying? Probably not. Like you said, the inherent scariness of the clip in question was apparently deemed so low that it was able to appear in an episode of a children's cartoon as a funny gag. I think this particular example also goes to show the importance of the environment in which art is experienced; many hold the belief that it is at least as important as the content itself.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Whoops thought I commented this but I'll try to type it out again briefly:

    I'm so glad you mentioned the spongebob gag lmao. I saw that as a little kid and was so confused.I agree with desensitization to violence and gore leading to an "up the ante" factor in more modern horror, although I wonder if further desensitization is leading to horror movies "slowing down" again. I'm thinking of the movie It Follows (2015?), which was praised for its slow moving, creepy monster with (almost) no very extreme violence or jump scares. The scene with the boy and the "ghost" in Parasite was also super scary, and there's hardly any movement. I do agree that these examples and others were heavily aided by sound (or lack there of) in a way that Nosferatu wasn't.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Great post and examination about the evolution of fear over time! Technology has certainly played a big role in both desensitization of violence and creation of new technology-related fears. The new Invisible Man remake actually does an interesting job incorporating technology into a modern day retelling of a classic monster film.

    I think your last point is really interesting too. The development of virtual reality has closely followed the Cinema of Attraction both in terms of content and distribution, so it is certainly related to film but I don't know if it will ever replace it. My capstone paper is actually about the state of virtual reality today (and how I tried to evolve with with a game I made) if you are ever interested in finding out more about that.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I think that this is a fantastic take on this film but I want to quibble with your notion that audiences know and experience more horror in visual culture and it has thus desensitized them to the possibility of finding older horror scary. We tend to think of the past with nostalgia and view it as a "simpler time" but we have to remember that this film in particular was made right after World War I, the war to end all wars, where the populace not only saw but experienced first hand the atrocities of war on a global scale the extent of which we cannot even begin to imagine. This includes the use of chemical warfare and trench warfare that left millions dead or alive and disfigured. In addition, the Great Flu Pandemic of 1918 infected a third of the world's population wiped out a huge portion of those infected. So the viewers of a film like Nosferatu would have been more used to seeing terrible visual spectacles of death than todays populations who only witness most atrocities second hand through visual culture.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I completely agree with this, but after watching The Untold Story this week, I found myself surprised that a film made over 30 years ago was able to shock and scare me more than anything I've seen in recent years. Amy talked a bit about how Hong Kong films have less taboo about showing violence towards children, but I think it's interesting that the type of visuals that scare us don't necessarily relate to technology or new societal fears, but things that have been very inherent and taboo for a long time. The fact that Nosferatu isn't scary even though it definitely examines a lot of primal fears for sure is linked to its reluctance to show violence, which Untold Story shows in prolonged detail.

    ReplyDelete